• a requirement that any of his staff needing access to classified information undergo a security clearance and complete written non-disclosure agreements;

• physical security requirements, that the Security Office is empowered to implement, including any necessary inspections; and

• investigations of suspected security violations by employees, such as the security violation committed by Scooter Libby when he unlawfully disclosed the identity of Valerie Plame Wilson, then a covert CIA operative.
  In addition, Mr. Cheney and his staff would be subject to investigation by the Senate Ethics Committee, which has the responsibility to investigate allegations of improper conduct which may reflect upon the Senate, including violations of law and the rules and regulations of the Senate.

Melanie Sloan, executive director of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington said Mr. Cheney's arguments raise new questions:

1. Since there is no fourth branch of government to which Mr. Cheney could belong, by claiming the Office of the Vice President is within the legislative branch, does Mr. Cheney agree that he is subject to Senate security procedures?

2. Mr. Cheney's office refused to describe its 2003 classification activities to the National Archives and Record Administration (NARA), but is he now willing to describe them to the Senate Security Office?

3. If Mr. Cheney does not believe that NARA's Information Security Oversight Office can conduct on-sight inspection of Mr. Cheney's office to see how sensitive material is handled, does he agree that the Senate Security Office can conduct such an inspection?

We'd really like some answers

Note from GR Editor: Google ad flow is controlled by robots which base content from words on our pages and may not agree with your or our point of view.
Email Us about ads or submissions | Copyright © 2007 YorkGrassroots.org
Site designed and maintained by Lindro